-  [Home] [WT

[Return] [Entire Thread] [Last 50 posts] [First 100 posts]
Posting mode: Reply
Name
Email
Subject   (reply to 12128)
Message
BB Codes
Captcha
File
[]
Embed   Help
Password  (for post and file deletion)
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG, SWF
  • Maximum file size allowed is 2000 KB.
  • Images greater than 200x200 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Read the rules and FAQ before posting.
  • Currently 2547 unique user posts. View Catalog

  • Blotter updated: 2013-05-24 Show/Hide Show All

File 133624652819.jpg - (72.01KB , 440x542 , tf2-goodday.jpg )
12128 No. 12128
This started as something I was writing in /afanfic involving the story I'm doing in there. A poster said she liked how I was depicting one of the characters (the BLU Spy), and I found myself contemplating some things I've contemplated many times before, but never thought to make a thread about.

To save people the trouble of looking for it, I'll just give a quick recap of what this is about, and why I'm curious to know what other people's own takes on the matter is. The main cast of the is a team of RED mercenaries, a BLU Spy, and a third team of mercenaries who used to work for RED company but went traitor. (This is all going by the concept of there being multiple teams of mercs working for each of the Mann brothers, and each team resembles the next for no reasons of any importance.)

I've mostly written all the characters based off of canon (although I've added a few non-canon things, ie. secret sweet gay lovin' going on between a few of them *cough*. For the sake of argument, I'm not going to consider “fanon” or “headcanon” here to be canon, since no matter how much I like shipping, say, Heavy and Medic, canon does not confirm or deny they're anything more than bro's). To help differentiate the RED Spy and the BLU Spy and thus, not make the first scene where both appeared an incomprehensible muddle, I gave the BLU one a French-Canadian accent.

I'd said earlier that joual!BLU Spy isn't intended as some kind of OC Spy. I am trying to write him as having a somewhat different attitude and method than RED Spy, without strongly deviating from canon in either Spy's case. I imagine BLU as a rougher around the edges, less flirtacious, and more avoidant of open combat when his own success is not 99% guaranteed(cowardly, you could say, or maybe furtive). Even so, I've still basically tried to keep him depicted like any good Spy- he's clever, two-faced, resourceful, and using grit and hidden spy tools to deal with the dangerous situation he's in. He's described as a Canadian, but I haven't wasted any time on working some kind of backstory for him into the main event.

Ever since I considered the implications of say, giving a Spy a Montreal accent instead of Parisian one, I've been kind of pondering the phenomenon of people calling their own versions of a TF2 class "original characters" ever since. I can't personally say I like it, but that's neither here nor there. Why I mention it is because makes me kind of wonder... Where does one put the line between “personal take on who's fucking who, who's friends with who, and how their canon backstories might be fleshed out”, and “these characters have the names of the TF2 cast, but their behaviour and personalities are nothing like canon”.

In stories where the author is basically writing the characters based on what little canon information we have about their personalities, how far does one have to deviate from canon before their cast would be more rightly considered “OC's”.

Is Gunter Ritter*, the RED Medic with a wife and three children, who was orphaned during the time of the Weimar Republic and spent the war practicing medicine in Switzerland, considered an OC? His personality and behaviour are all informed by canon material, after all. The writer has just given him a name, and added a backstory to flesh out the conspicuous canon void on official Medic history.

What about Medic, the BLU Medic with no disclosed past, who sleeps with BLU Heavy and bakes cookies for his team whenever they win a match? He also acts like Medic of the game and comics, and hasn't been given a name or a past. Nothing in canon confirms he's involved in sexual relations with anyone, though, and the only 'proof' of Medic having a domestic bent is in the Christmas cards. Is he an OC? Or does his author have to ignore/add personal ideas to not only canon, but also fanon, before he's considered an OC? Is it up to the author's discretion, or everyone else's, if a character is interpreted as “The Medic”, and not “So-and-so's medic OC”?


*I just invented this all on the spot as an example, I'm not making any reference to any stories I'm consciously aware of.
>> No. 12140
Good question, I can't claim to have a clear opinion on the subject. Thinking about it too much causes me to question the nature of fanon.

One thing I like about TF2 is that it's so easy for fans to interpret and work with the characters, and it hardly ever seems wrong just because it's not canon. I'm not usually big on OCs, however. This may just be because I often lose interest when I no longer recognize them as the characters from the game. I guess I'm fine with any interpretation as long as it retains the traits I like in that character. It's not up to me to decide if it's a valid interpretation, though. Obviously some writing looks more like canon, but it's not technically canon either way, right?
I think canon itself is pretty subjective stuff and not always clear-cut, especially with a piece of fiction as dynamic as TF2.
>> No. 12141
I see canon vs. non-canon as more of a continuum...

1. Is the character backstory consistent with the Word of Valve? The Meet the Team videos, the trading card information, the wiki, the in game voice commands, the comics, the blogs, etc. All else aside, that's what I take to be "factually" true about the cast, unless Valve says "nope, that wasn't canon" (like in the case of the Mac comic). Where Valve is more vague (like whether the BLU Spy is schtupping the RED Scout's mother or not), I assume so because of the voice commands, but I still label it as "personal headcanon sort-of supported by canon material, but I wouldn't cry about it if Valve came out and nixed it".
2. Is the character consistent with in-game (non-griefer) behavior and habits? This was the source I relied to for characterization before some of the later Meet the [Team] videos came out. So in my mind, Sniper and Engineer were pals long before it was suggested in the promotional videos because as an Engineer, I would tend to plunk dispensers next to Snipers. Medics were super-stressed and grumpy all the time, and hated Heavies who acted like Medics were their personal pets and acted ridiculously reckless while being healed, because that was how I acted as a Medic. And so on and so forth. This one, I tend to defer to canon wherever contradictions appeared, but I still prefer my version. So I don't mind stories where the members of the team actively hate each other and can barely work as a cohesive unit because I've been on those teams, but I don't consider those stories of THE cream of the crop RED team because that nonsense would have gotten the offenders kicked out long time ago.
3. Is the character consistent with 1960's history and culture? Or at least the Hollywood version, since TF2's version of world events seem rather different than what happened in reality. I tend not to care about the classes political, religious, or cultural leanings as much because discussing those topics are controversial and I couldn't really do those topics justice without an amount of research that I don't really care to do for pretendy fun times. But I'm not above assuming things like Spy wearing sock garters because that would be a rather in-character thing for Spy to do, if only because he's supposed to be a walking French stereotype.
4. Can the backstory be handwaved as "because it would be funny"? This is pretty much what I use to flesh out the rest of the characters. Did Sniper have a wife whom he beat to death with a golf trophy, probably not, but it makes for amusing headcanon, so sometimes I have that as backstory, sometimes I don't. Is Demoman a conspiracy theorist who thinks the Illuminati are plotting world domination? Considering his obsession with the supernatural, why not? Maybe the Illuminati even actually exists in TF2-land. (Though, personally, Soldier seems more the type to believe that the local water supply is laced with LSD or what have you.)

I pretty much judge all TF2 characters, regardless of how "close" they may be to canon, by those standards, so even if they fail on some criteria, I don't dock the story points if it's still a good (or entertaining) story, but I definitely grade characters on how "standard" they are.

Even with my own RP, when I was in Mayfield I considered my Sniper somewhat non-canonical because I added the following (among other things) to his backstory:
1. At least one of his parents are British, and he was born in Great Britain before moving to Australia. (Blame Zero Punctuation. I'd made this up before Valve told us Sniper's last name is "Mundy", so I gave him the last name of "Croshaw"--but just in case, I decided that this was an alias. It pays to be prepared.)
2. He was sort-of married to a girl who left him. (Inspired by that line from "Meet the Sniper" again, because it makes for delicious angst.)
3. He had a Friends With Benefits relationship with a RED Spy (notice I use "a" and not "the") before said Spy was abruptly transferred out of the team. (This one was purely because I was shipping Sniper/Spy a lot harder than I do now.)
[Return] [Entire Thread] [Last 50 posts] [First 100 posts]


Delete Post []
Password  
Report Post
Reason