>>
|
No. 12085
>>12074
You're probably talking about me. Yes, i'm afraid i'm still attached to some out-dated freudian conceptions (one of my contacts argues with me, whatever, when i annoy him saying that "psychoanalysis is dead", hehe), but it's more because of the roots of my education inside psychology (my college is well notorious in my country to give special attention to psychoanalysis, Freud, Jung and Melanie Klein. And btw, the psychoanalysis is very strong in my country, especially because it’s not entirely disposable). But i'm pretty sure that the only freundian conception i used, which was the Pleasure Principle, holds up well.
But i'm afraid, too, that i'm more stuck now with biological, neurological and genetic aspects. You know, i don't study psychology anymore... like i said, it's more a hobby, so i tend to direct it to fields i kinda like.
So, i'm here more to extend the recommendations inside literature for you guys: you guys should look for "The Selfish Gene", from Richard Dawkins (good cientist, horrible human being). And, far more inside the psychologic field, you all should take a look at the "Psychology of the mental disordersâ€, of David S. Holmes, published on 1997.
(P.S.: i'm glad that this thread was made. I was about to say that we had distorted the whole conversation at that poor thread, hehe. This and other things).
|