>>
|
No. 13106
>>13104
Many theories behind it. I personally think Freudian stuff's a bit nuts, but here it goes.
Basically, at some young, primitive age, we learn to discover the differences between our parents, and thus acquire gender. Almost all children develop some sort of attraction for their opposite gender parent, but it's nothing obscene at that age. Just "When I gwow up I'm gonna mawwy daddy, and be a pwincess" sort of idea.
As the child grows, they're meant to become more independent, and less dependent on their mother. With a father figure in their life, they learn to transfer the opposite-sex attachment to the parent of the same sex, or a figure in place of it. 'Every little boy wants to be like his daddy' sort of deal. If a father figure is absent, then this can be a problem.
The mother, in this equation, must also be willing to let the child grow away from her, and become independent. If she's too overbearing, and convinced to let him stay her little boy, then often, he'll let her. I'm thinking, with Scout being the youngest of his brothers, it's entirely possible that she'd want him to stay her little baby boy for a bit longer.
If a father figure is absent in Scout's life, it also could lend something more to this. Perhaps his father left at a crucial point (the beginnings of the Oedipal stages are between 3-5), and Scout strived to try and fill his shoes. Be the man of the house.
For more information, watch that episode of American Dad I saw last night, where Stan had issues with his mother's boyfriends.
|